On Mon, 09 Mar 1998 13:16:44 -0500, Bill Hamilton wrote:
BH>The point is that the creationist objection that historical events
>are nonrepeatible and/or that they are not subject to experimentation
>is a potential danger to any branch of science that has to use
>indirect observation.
This is no "creationist objection" "that historical events are
nonrepeatible" and "not subject to experimentation." It is a
Darwinist *claim*.
If it is a problem for Darwinism's status as a science, then
so be it.
Steve
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen E (Steve) Jones ,--_|\ sejones@ibm.net
3 Hawker Avenue / Oz \ Steve.Jones@health.wa.gov.au
Warwick 6024 ->*_,--\_/ Phone +61 8 9448 7439
Perth, West Australia v "Test everything." (1Thess 5:21)
--------------------------------------------------------------------