Same old stuff. Behe and Berlinski were not as impressive or as
much fun as I'd expected. The British philosopher at least had some
perspective and good will. Mainly I was reflecting on how important
are style, strength, and preparation, in these things. If Johnson
had something original going for himself in biology, he's be quite
a figure.
There's a problem of levels--materialistic thinking is a subset of
religious thinking. Should evolutionary biologists recognize
creationism? Why should they? It has no connection to their science.
-- Cliff Lundberg ~ San Francisco ~ cliff@noevalley.com