Wesley -- don't take this wrong, but after reading the interchanges on
this (including this last one) between you & Elby & others, sparked by
your "giggle" post of a few days ago, this non-biologist (or obsolete
physicist, take your pick) is still confused.
Frankly, it does seem that discussions of what X claims on the basis of a
single quote and in the absence of the presence of X, whether X be
Dawkins, Darwin, Johnson or Gish, is not terribly interesting. I suspect
that you (and most others) might agree! < G >
You need not feel any obligation to reply to t his -- it is just an
observation. As a "lurker" to the interchange, I simply cannot follow
what it is you are arguing about. If this be due to my lack of
biological understanding, that is OK. I suspect it is more than that
however,
Happy holidays...
Burgy