> Elby wrote, in part: "The question of whether extra-naturalistic
> hypotheses and
> explanations can be tested in any adequate way thus remains open
> and unanswered, I think"
>
> I will debate this assertion. If you put the word "scientifically" before
> "tested" in the above, you may have a point, though the ID people might
> object.
Pardon my ignorance, but who are the "ID people" and what are their views?
Lloyd Eby