<< But Lewis approach
is really quite different than that being used by most people
here. Lewis does not start with the premise "God exists" and then
apply logical consistency or whatever.>>
That's because Lewis is making a different argument. His is the moral argument
for God's existence. What Russell has been hammered on is the moral bankruptcy
of materialism.
The two will converge when Russell confronts Lewis on the source for his
"empathy."
Jim