Re: ICR and its slurs

Russell Stewart (diamond@rt66.com)
Tue, 27 May 1997 13:11:34 -0600

>Russell believes there is no God. Jim believes there is. If Russell is
>right then the Judeo-Christian philosophy is subjective. If Jim is right
>then it is objective. I think the confusion arises in the fact that
>Russell is not granting Jim's presupposition that God exists. The
>Judeo-Christian philosophy is only subjective if God does not exist. This
>argument will go nowhere if those presuppositions are not granted. (You
>may want to argue the validity of those presuppositions but that is an
>entirely different argument.) If Jim is right, and God exists, and He will
>reward those who follow him and punish those who disobey His law, then this
>IS a transcendant, objective moral law whether we like it or not and
>therefore superior to any subjective, human convention.

That's a fair summary of the situation. Of course, there is not one shred
of evidence to prove (logically and scientifically) that God exists.

_____________________________________________________________
| Russell Stewart |
| http://www.rt66.com/diamond/ |
|_____________________________________________________________|
| Albuquerque, New Mexico | diamond@rt66.com |
|_____________________________|_______________________________|

2 + 2 = 5, for very large values of 2.