<<Jim: That's exactly what I would like you to do. The issue is a simple
one. You
have asserted that it has been "shown" Behe is deluded. Outside of the
erroneous talk.origins piece, what do you base that on?
I base it on the talk.origins piece which you claim is erroneous but which
I claim shows a viable mechanism for irreducibly complex systems to form.>>
I thank you for a direct answer. This is as far as we can go with this. I
believe the talk.origins is not viable, and have pointed out at least one
major mistake Robison made (re: the journals) that ought to cause you to
reconsider how reliable this piece really is. But you have chosen to stick
with it anyway.
We have to leave it at that.
Jim