[...]
>
>My textbook says:
>
>"The Reynolds number was developed during the last century to describe the
>nature of fluid flow, in particular, how different circumstances might result
>in fluid flows that are dynamically similar. The Reyonolds number tells us how
>properties of an animal affect fluid flow around it." [Kardong, pg. 137]
>
>Now you know why I didn't want to get into this. Is there anything more
>boring? A Clinton policy speech perhaps?
>
Jim, Jim, Jim, you ignorant dork, now you've gone too far. Comparing
something as glorious as Reynolds number to a slick willy speech?
Ack !!!!
Brian Harper
Associate Professor
Applied Mechanics
Ohio State University