Re: Fw: The Mere Creation Discussion

Randy Landrum (randyl@efn.org)
Fri, 6 Dec 1996 09:36:53 -0800 (PST)

>
> This is very nice, Randy, but its a strawman since Darwinians do
> not claim that pure chance "achieved the degree of complexity and

Yes I have heard those comments before if not pure chance then what
creative force?

> himself from such a notion as this. Darwinism involves random
> mutations + natural selection. Natural selection is about as opposite
> from pure chance as one could get. Interestingly, random mutations

Where did the random mutation come from? A mutation from life? How can
random mutation be process of initial creation?

> is not even pure chance in the sense that that word is used in
> probability. In Darwinism, random as in random mutation means
> only that the appearance of a mutation does not anticipate the
> needs of an organism. It does not mean that one particular mutation
> is selected at random from the vast number of possible mutations
> with equal probability.
>

Hold on there. Your example is like finding a watch in the woods and
neglecting the fact that it's a watch and trying to explain how a scratch
got on its face. This goes back to my fish head example, yea you might be
able to explain away the missing head but where did the fish come from?

=====m-_
`,_` ./.~`-,. "Throughout the hundreds of millions
=,` / 'i '~+=,_ of years the coelacanths have kept
v. . !-. = __. ~\=. the same form and structure. Here is
` ,_. , i`,_'\.- ~e_ one of the great mysteries of evolution"
' -.-,s @@Wi[ ,z,c \\.
.Y/ ,_-8!s/*fi! '',_\,!@m[ Jacques Millot, "The Coelacanth"
_si /i@Wzzz`--,dPV\gW@f
YP -i 'i -. gAY,g@@P ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
,!/!5 . iK| !d@/` ~
-=`-(- ',,`! Wf+i dMTf~~Y**f[ ~ Randy Landrum
!-! ! ,./,@b- -WW/b@mW~msm! ~ B.A. Brooks Institute
P-' , ' ~_dA~~M@WD*fV\]bA@@f ~ US Coordinator FaithNet 700:1000/0.0
e..! ,,!A`im/ - .*NW@@@Wf ~ randyl@efn.org
*\ 5-~~,@. = sNWW@@@@Af ~
@XW`. A~ 2+e2@@@@@A~ ~