Re: supernatural observation & faith def.

Thomas L Moore (mooret@GAS.UUG.Arizona.EDU)
Wed, 11 Sep 1996 16:08:20 -0700 (MST)

On 11 Sep 1996, Jim Bell wrote:

> Tom Moore asked:
>
> <<This brings up a question I've always wondered, what is incompatible with
> "intelligent design?">>
>
> That would be "random, purposeless design," wouldn't it?
>
> Jim
>

Why? Purposeless is subjective anyway, and people design random elements
into things all the time - i.e. random number generators. So, give me an
example of what you're considering "random, purposeless design" that
can't be designed that way by an intelligent designer.

Tom