Creation mythologies because they are based on faith not observation, cannot
be exposed to, and changed by the observations of others.
They are at the core different, not just in their conclusions.
I never wrote (nor did I mean to suggest) that evolution is a law.
On Sep 5, 9:26am, Glenn Dixon wrote:
> Subject: Re: theory vs. law
> Stephen Gooch wrote:
>
> > If creation mythology is introduced into the classroom, all creation
> > mythologies must be included - not just Christian. All forms of African,
> > Asian and others would need to be taught. The premise of all these is
> > faith (they cannot be proven or disproven). If they were<<snip>>
>
> So the definition of "faith-based" is that something cannot be
> proven or disproven? And you suggest that the *theory* of evolution
> can be proven? I obviously missed the news that the 'theory of
> evolution' had now become the 'law of evolution.' :o\
>
> > Evolution on the other hand is not based on faith.<<snip>>
>
> According to your previous definition it is!
>
> --
> Glenn Dixon *********************************************
> Worship Leader | Web Designer and Future Web Guru
> The Jesus Center | Web-Wide Word
> http://flash.net/~tjc | http://flash.net/~webwide
> *********************************************************
>-- End of excerpt from Glenn Dixon
-- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-| Stephen Gooch | stephen.gooch@asu.edu || 770.903.6778 | http://goodnet.com/~ej23298 |-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-#!/bin/shecho '16i[q]sa[ln0=aln100%Pln100/snlbx]sbA0D3F204445524F42snlbxq'|dc;exit