>"A theistic realist assumes that the universe and all its creatures
>were brought into existence for a purpose by God. Theistic realists
>expect this "fact" of creation to have empirical, observable con-
>sequences that are different from the consequences one would observe
>if the universe were the product of nonrational causes (such as
>Jacques Monod's "chance and necessity")." (Johnson P.E., "Reason in
>the Balance", InterVarsity Press: Downers Grove Ill., 1995,
>p208-209)
>
What about a TE believing in the observable (at the time) resurrection?
That is certainly a difference from what would be expected in a
nonrational universe. Or doesn't this count?
glenn
Foundation,Fall and Flood
http://members.gnn.com/GRMorton/dmd.htm