personal attacks

James E Hopper (hopper@k12.wcsu.ctstateu.edu)
Fri, 3 May 1996 07:53:31 -0400

Denis Lamoureux wrote:

>On Wed, 1 May 1996, Stephen Jones wrote:
>
>> Agreed. But you seem to be implying it is an "each other" thing. If
>> you are referring to me, have not "bit" anything except my tongue!
>> :-) If *anyone* claims that I have said *anything* that could be
>> contrued as a personal attack against those who have personally
>> attacked me, please post same and I will unreservedly apologise.
>>
>> God bless.
>>
>> Steve
>
>
>>From sjones@iinet.net.au Thu May 2 10:01:44 1996
>Date: Wed, 01 May 96 20:20:24 EDT
>From: Stephen Jones <sjones@iinet.net.au>
>To: Chuck Warman-Evolution <evolution@Calvin.EDU>
>Subject: RE: "Primary Literature"
>
>
>> Good point! If these "experts" cannot get their point across to
>> intelligent laymen (save your stamp Denis! <g>), but only to their
>> own ilk, then they will have failed.
>
>
>Stephen,
>You posted these one day apart. Need I comment?
>
>Regards,
>Denis

Yes Denis, I think you should make a comment. I don't see a personal attack
in what Stephen said. Where is it?

Regards,

Jim

Jim Hopper
hopper@k12.wcsu.ctstateu.edu