While I agree with this assessment, I wasn't specifically referring to the
use of science to detect supernatural activity, although this is a fine
point. Rather, my thinking was that I find it hard to envision how creation
models can be used as the basis for formulating questions of nature that can
be addressed by science as a way to further understanding of the world. I
am also not sure how models of intelligent design, such as posited by Mike
Behe, can lead to new experimental questions.
I find it somewhat ironic that, despite the claims of Phil Johnson and
echoed by Jim Bell, it is hard for me to see how this sort of
"supernaturalism" actually expands our understanding. Supernaturalism may
allow different conclusions from naturalistic data, but I don't see that it
is able to lead to new questions from which to continue learning about the
naturalistic world. The conclusion that "God Did It" seems to carry the
codicil that it is, therefore, not necessary to look further. I see in
history and on this reflector, that this sort of "theistic realism" tends to
stifle rather than stimulate exploration of the world.
Steve
____________________________________________________________________________
Steven S. Clark, Ph.D. Phone: (608) 263-9137
Associate Professor FAX: (608) 263-4226
Dept. of Human Oncology and email: ssclark@facstaff.wisc.edu
UW Comprehensive Cancer Ctr
University of Wisconsin "To disdain philosophy is really to
Madison, WI 53792 be a philosopher." Blaise Pascal
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
Steven S. Clark, Ph.D. Phone: (608) 263-9137
Associate Professor FAX: (608) 263-4226
Dept. of Human Oncology and email: ssclark@facstaff.wisc.edu
UW Comprehensive Cancer Ctr
University of Wisconsin "To disdain philosophy is really to
Madison, WI 53792 be a philosopher." Blaise Pascal
____________________________________________________________________________