You must be a good lawyer. You totally avoided my other question. What would
you consider to be the criteria for a gradual morphological change. If you
can not define what you believe will prove the case, you 1) will never know if
you find it, and 2) won't consider anything to be proof of gradual transition.
I am not going to let you off this hook. You must tell me what evidence would
convince you that morphological change occurred. If you can't, then you are
merely playing games and not dealing with the data.What will happen is that I
will work my lil' ol' heart out, and you will sit back and say "Not good
enough!' So, what is the answer to this question?
glenn