RE: Glenn's dilemma

From: Glenn Morton <glennmorton@entouch.net>
Date: Thu Oct 21 2004 - 01:09:44 EDT

>-----Original Message-----
>From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu]On
>Behalf Of Either Carol or John Burgeson
>Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 6:05 PM

>
>But "objective evidence" is NOT all I have to go on. We have been over
>this before, of course.

What I object to is a religion having any value if it claims that anything
goes, which is what I see happening. If all we have is our man-made portrait
of god, how can we tell that we actually have anything substantive?
Subjective evidence can often fool one into believing falsehoods. You are
right, we have been over this before. A religion to have some validity must
have some grounding in actual fact.
Received on Thu Oct 21 06:54:25 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Oct 21 2004 - 06:54:26 EDT