From: Glenn Morton (glennmorton@entouch.net)
Date: Tue Sep 16 2003 - 22:14:20 EDT
This is a perfect illustration of why it is unlikely that the calculations
of low probability made by ID and creationist folk for proteins and DNA is
just simply wrong. If functionality can be preserved in the face of such
extreme mutations of the sentence, then the probabilities for finding a
randomly generated meaningful sentence is quite high relative to current
calculations.
-----Original Message-----
From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu]On
Behalf Of Walter Hicks
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 9:11 AM
To: ASA
Subject: [Fwd: Raednig is esay]
For those of us who are proof reading impaired, the following is
interesting
My spell checker hated this email.
Walt
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Raednig is esay
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 10:13:18 -0400
From: "Tom Wiener" <t.wiener@ieee.org>
Reply-To: <t.wiener@ieee.org>
To: <t.wiener@ieee.org>
The brain does amazing things, doesn't it?
Instructions: Just read the sentence straight through
Acocdrnig to an elgnsih unviesitry sutdy the oredr of letetrs in a word
dosen't mttaer, the olny thnig thta's iopmrantt is that the frsit and lsat
ltteer of eevry word is in the crrecot ptoision. The rset can be jmbueld and
one is stlil able to raed the txet wiohtut dclftfuiiy.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Sep 16 2003 - 22:17:14 EDT