From: Darryl Maddox (dpmaddox@arn.net)
Date: Fri Sep 12 2003 - 21:01:08 EDT
Some of you may remember when the YEC's finally accepted the idea of glaciation and the ice ages - then they finally gave up and went with plate tectonics, not exactly the "standard" version, what's next? But then again I can't say some of them are much more stubborn than some other geologists have been over some issues we finally gave up and admitted the evidence supported.
Darryl
----- Original Message -----
From: RFaussette@aol.com
To: gwcollins@algol.co.uk ; asa@lists.calvin.edu
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 12:39 PM
Subject: Re: ICR/AIG claims
In a message dated 9/12/03 10:00:35 AM Eastern Daylight Time, gwcollins@algol.co.uk writes:
But there can, and do, come times when sufficient accumulation of contrary evidence
causes a 'flip' in one's perspective - a change in one's worldview, if you like. Sometimes
such a change can be a quite major overhaul of one's former beliefs.
I agree.
The opposite can also happen.
The new perspective can affirm one's beliefs to such an extent that one maintains them as never before.
rich
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 12 2003 - 21:03:43 EDT