Flood posts (was RE: Noahic Covenant)

From: Jim Eisele (jeisele@starpower.net)
Date: Fri Jul 26 2002 - 19:17:01 EDT

  • Next message: Bill Payne: "Re: Coal and YEC models"

    Before Glenn gets us off course any further...

    1. THERE IS NO DEBATE. The flood has been found, located, identified,
        written about, discussed, debated, carbon-dated, pottery-dated, etc.
    2. "Hills" was mistranslated as "mountains." 15 cubits will cover no
        mountains, no matter how much Bible translators, the ICR, and AiG
        want it to. END OF STORY.
    3. Some Bible commentaries accept Biblical historical inerrancy
       (in the originals). Others do not. This is not a trivial issue.
        But please, no more vague references to Bible scholars/commentaries.
        Own up to your position.

    As to the landing site, my guess is anchors by night, oars/punting by day.

    Jim Eisele
    Genesis in Question
    http://genesisinquestion.org



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 27 2002 - 00:48:30 EDT