RE: Noahic Covenant

From: Dick Fischer (dickfischer@earthlink.net)
Date: Wed Jul 24 2002 - 01:27:15 EDT

  • Next message: Glenn Morton: "RE: Coal and YEC models"

    Hi Glenn, you wrote (a few days back):

    >I am delighted to see you start to think about the topography. The USGS
    >would most assuredly have something and if not that, a physical map of Iraq
    >in a good encyclopedia will also do. It all slopes down to the Persian
    >Gulf.

    Reminds me of a story my grandfather told me once about when he was a
    truck salesman in western Colorado for International Harvester in the
    late 1920's to the early 1930's. He was competing against another
    truck manufacturer for a contract to provide school buses for one of
    the towns in that area. When the school board interviewed my
    granddad, he asked them how comfortable they would be with their
    children, some of whom lived in mountainous areas, riding in school
    buses that were built on truck frames the way the competing company
    built them. When they thought about that for awhile, they awarded
    the contract to International. Then my granddad smiled at me and
    added, "Of course, we did too. That's the way they built them in
    those days."

    Glenn, you have repeatedly objected as to how Noah's boat got from
    Shuruppak in southern Mesopotamia to the mountains (hills) of Ararat
    (Urartu, Armenia). The boat had to move north and east against the
    topography. Yet you seem to act as if this presents no problem at
    all to a Noah whom you posit lived 5.5 million years ago in the
    Mediterranean basin when the infilling of the Mediterranean sea could
    have floated the boat to no higher than sea level.

    I would suggest that the biblical landing site named in Genesis
    presents just as formidable an obstacle to your scenario as it does
    to mine. You even have an intermediate mountain range between the
    Mediterranean sea and the mountains (or hills) of Armenia. Punting
    won't help with that. Notwithstanding I would love to see your
    treatise on the techniques of Australopithicine shipbuilding. A bit
    more complicated than bone flutes.

    >I will take physical evidence any day over literary evidence.

    It is precisely the literary evidence from the inspired Scriptures
    that has us wrestling with this. If it were not for the fact that
    the flood narrative of Genesis 6-9 is in our Bible, none of us would
    give a hoot. Who would care if Utnapishtim ever landed on Mount
    Nisir as stated in the eleventh chapter of Gilgamesh?

    I think Vernon makes a better point. Why float a bunch of local
    animals around in a local flood? It's not the who, what, where,
    when, how questions that are so tricky. It's the "why" questions
    that drive us crazy.

    Dick Fischer - The Origins Solution - www.orislol.com
    ěThe Answer we should have known about 150 years agoî



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 26 2002 - 11:26:14 EDT