RE: Infusion of the soul as a process

From: JW Burgeson (hoss_radbourne@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Jul 23 2002 - 11:46:15 EDT

Next message: JW Burgeson: "RE: Infusion of the soul as a process"

Previous message: george murphy: "Re: deception in perception"
Maybe in reply to: RDehaan237@aol.com: "Infusion of the soul as a process"
Next in thread: JW Burgeson: "RE: Infusion of the soul as a process"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Marque wrote:

>>My gut feeling says point of conception for infusion. That's a very clean
>>time for the infusion. >>

How, then, do you answer the three points I made? I will agree that "point
of conception" is a possible answer. I would not agree that it is a "clean
time" as my previous post argued.

Burgy

www.burgy.50megs.com

_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com

Next message: JW Burgeson: "RE: Infusion of the soul as a process"
Previous message: george murphy: "Re: deception in perception"
Maybe in reply to: RDehaan237@aol.com: "Infusion of the soul as a process"
Next in thread: JW Burgeson: "RE: Infusion of the soul as a process"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 23 2002 - 12:05:51 EDT