Mike wrote:
>is a meteor crater, which would be able to be dated by some means. However,
>this is in an area which was overgrown by vegetation and the "crater" was
>covered by water for thousands of years, unlike the crater in the Arizona
>desert. Positively identifying it as a meteor crater may not be that easy
>even if it is one.
>
Actually, the fact that it was covered with water should help preserve
things. Sedimentation takes place under water, erosion above the water.
glenn
see http://www.glenn.morton.btinternet.co.uk/dmd.htm
for lots of creation/evolution information
anthropology/geology/paleontology/theology\
personal stories of struggle
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 30 2002 - 13:36:06 EDT