Re: A Real Answer (was Re: Bear sacrifice)

From: Walter Hicks (wallyshoes@mindspring.com)
Date: Tue Apr 23 2002 - 11:15:38 EDT

  • Next message: Jim Eisele: "Waah, the discussion opposes my beliefs (was Re: Pansies?)"

    Jan de Koning wrote:

    > Having said all that, I must say, that some people obviously do not want to
    > take part in a discussion, but keep on shouting: "I am right." but do not
    > listen to counter-arguments. As said above, I did not hear the beginning
    > of this very "strange" discussion,

    You were lucky!

    >but it appears to me that Jim is only
    > wanting to hear himself, and then talking is useless, except of course, we
    > must encourage him to study. ASA the problem? It is one place where any
    > Christian can express his thinking, and engage in a discussion. But if one
    > starts and in general accuses everyone but himself of not listening, it is
    > better to keep quiet, and hope that the offending party learns from the
    > discussions going on here

    I would suggest, if Jim continues to be insulting and abrasive, that all
    us stop responding to his posts until he can behave like a Christian
    gentleman.

    Walt

    -- 
    ===================================
    Walt Hicks <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>
     
    In any consistent theory, there must
    exist true but not provable statements.
    (Godel's Theorem)
    

    You can only find the truth with logic If you have already found the truth without it. (G.K. Chesterton) ===================================



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 23 2002 - 11:14:09 EDT