RE: How and when did we become "men"?

From: Jim Eisele (jeisele@starpower.net)
Date: Sun Apr 21 2002 - 10:15:30 EDT

Next message: Shuan Rose: "RE: A matter of trust?"

Previous message: Walter Hicks: "Re: A matter of trust?"
Maybe in reply to: MikeSatterlee@cs.com: "How and when did we become "men"?"
Next in thread: John (Burgy) Burgeson: "RE: How and when did we become "men"?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Shuan writes

>I am considering Dick Fisccher's and Glenn Morton's positions
>among others.

Dick Fischer has done a "boatload" of research. I think what
he has found on Gen 2-11 is pretty much a closed book.

Glenn raises interesting questions about "when was the first
man." Somehow, he manages to completely ignore Dick's research.

Thanks for you open-mindedness, Shuan :)

Jim

Next message: Shuan Rose: "RE: A matter of trust?"
Previous message: Walter Hicks: "Re: A matter of trust?"
Maybe in reply to: MikeSatterlee@cs.com: "How and when did we become "men"?"
Next in thread: John (Burgy) Burgeson: "RE: How and when did we become "men"?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 21 2002 - 14:15:13 EDT