RE: Troy's two cents.

From: Don Perrett (don.perrett@verizon.net)
Date: Sat Mar 16 2002 - 22:05:21 EST

  • Next message: Troy Elliott Eckhardt: "Re: Troy's two cents."

    Interjecting for a moment: I would add that several people have also brought
    up the issue of cultural beliefs and practices of the time. Many, if not
    all, of the cultures of ancient times saw the dawn as the ascension of their
    God and dusk as the descent(even death) of their God. Each day would bring
    in a rebirth of life and a return of that God. These beliefs are reflected
    in many cultures and languages of today. "The dawn of a new era". This
    culture understanding of ancient times would therefore support the idea, not
    just in translation, of a set of periods of creation and not necessarily
    actual days.
    Don P

    -----Original Message-----
    From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu]On
    Behalf Of Jim Eisele
    Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 3:42 PM
    To: spamfilter@BizTaxPros.com
    Cc: Peter Ruest; asa@calvin.edu
    Subject: Re: Troy's two cents.

    Hi Troy. Maybe this gives a fuller picture to your earlier
    post.

    >The clincher for me in the "what is a day?" discussion is "and the evening
    >and the morning were the nth day."

    Newman & Eckelmann, in Genesis One and the Origins of the Earth
    1977, 6th printing) give us an answer. They say that each day
    represents the beginning of God's creative period.

    So, if we like, we can take it as a literal day.

    Peter Ruest follows up in a previous post to the ASA listserve on
    Sun Feb 24 2002 - 13:29:34 EST

    "Evening" [^erev] could be translated: going or entering into
    (something), going down (setting of the sun), or a transition (mixing
    between the previous state and the following one). "Morning" [boqer] can
    quite generally mean a dawning (e.g. of a new day or age)".

    Jim



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 16 2002 - 22:05:47 EST