Re: The Bible is not a scientific text??

From: Walter Hicks (wallyshoes@mindspring.com)
Date: Fri Mar 15 2002 - 12:29:46 EST

Next message: Jan de Koning: "Re: ASA Perspectives"

Previous message: Walter Hicks: "Re: Power-Hungry Church"
In reply to: Allen Roy: "Re: The Bible is not a scientific text??"
Next in thread: Jim Eisele: "Re: The Bible is not a scientific text??"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

No, Jim just behaves obnoxiously. That is different than actually being
obnoxious.

Walt

Allen Roy wrote:
>
> You are really obnoxious, Jim.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jim Eisele <jeisele@starpower.net>
> To: <asa@calvin.edu>
> Cc: <allenroy@peoplepc.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 2:13 AM
> Subject: Re: The Bible is not a scientific text??
>
> > Come on, Allen, get serious...
> >
> > >I feel my self being dragged back into a time consuming discussion. I
> cant
> > >do that so I'm going to try to shut up
> >
> > If you don't want to be part of the listserv, don't post!!!!
> >
> > Jim
> >
> >

-- 
===================================
Walt Hicks <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>
 
In any consistent theory, there must
exist true but not provable statements.
(Godel's Theorem)
You can only find the truth with logic 
If you have already found the truth
without it. (G.K. Chesterton)
===================================

Next message: Jan de Koning: "Re: ASA Perspectives"
Previous message: Walter Hicks: "Re: Power-Hungry Church"
In reply to: Allen Roy: "Re: The Bible is not a scientific text??"
Next in thread: Jim Eisele: "Re: The Bible is not a scientific text??"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 15 2002 - 12:28:37 EST