Re: Flawed anthro views of RTB

From: Michael Roberts (topper@robertschirk.u-net.com)
Date: Mon Jan 21 2002 - 17:49:22 EST

  • Next message: robert rogland: "Re: Flawed anthro views of RTB"

    Excellent point Moorad has argued himself into a position of total
    scepticism.

    Michael
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Glenn Morton" <glenn.morton@btinternet.com>
    To: <alexanian@uncwil.edu>
    Cc: "Asa@Calvin. Edu" <asa@calvin.edu>
    Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 4:50 AM
    Subject: RE: Flawed anthro views of RTB

    > Hi Moorad,
    >
    > One question and one statement.
    >
    > >-----Original Message-----
    > >From: Moorad Alexanian<alexanian@uncwil.edu>
    > >[mailto:alexanian@uncwil.edu]
    > >Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 12:11 PM
    > >To: george murphy; Glenn Morton
    > >Cc: Asa@Calvin. Edu
    > >Subject: RE: Flawed anthro views of RTB
    > I do not have to prove that there is a universe out
    > >there that our
    > >sense and physical devices detect. I assume it! I do not dispute your
    > >assumptions to study nature, but one can never be conclusive about
    > >what really
    > >happened.
    >
    > Does this include the possibility that we can never be sure that the
    > resurrection occurred?
    >
    >
    > Your forensic study of the past is fine but it can never
    > >lead to a
    > >certainty, the best it can be is to be true beyond a reasonable doubt.>
    >
    > The resurrection occurred in the past and can only be studied today
    > forensically!
    >
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 21 2002 - 17:57:34 EST