Re: Pasteur and nature of science

From: Bill Payne (bpayne15@juno.com)
Date: Wed Jan 02 2002 - 02:54:33 EST

Next message: george murphy: "Re: Pasteur and nature of science"

Previous message: george murphy: "Re: Exegesis or Eisegesis?"
Next in thread: Gordon Simons: "Re: Pasteur and nature of science"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 1 Jan 2002 20:52:48 -0500 (EST) Gordon Simons
<gsimons@email.unc.edu> writes:

> What eventually overcomes this opposition, when
> the ideas are correct, are the things Ted Davis attacks:
> observations and experiments.

Then by your criteria, the theory of evolution is not "scientific
knowledge", or is it?

Bill
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.

Next message: george murphy: "Re: Pasteur and nature of science"
Previous message: george murphy: "Re: Exegesis or Eisegesis?"
Next in thread: Gordon Simons: "Re: Pasteur and nature of science"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 02 2002 - 02:58:48 EST