War over Darwin examined in 'Evolution'

From: Moorad Alexanian (alexanian@uncwil.edu)
Date: Fri Sep 21 2001 - 08:31:37 EDT

  • Next message: Graham Morbey: "Re: Brother"

    from the September 21, 2001 edition -
    http://www.csmonitor.com/2001/0921/p19s1-altv.html

    War over Darwin examined in 'Evolution'

    A new PBS TV series shows how his theories continue to affect us.

    By M.S. Mason | Television critic of The Christian Science Monitor

    PASADENA, CALIF. - "Evolution" means change. But the theory of evolution
    means war - at least for certain religious groups that take Genesis
    literally. And the new seven-part, eight-hour series on PBS, Evolution, does
    its best not only to explain Charles Darwin's theory of the origins of
    material life, but to take seriously conservative Christians' religious
    objections to it.
    The two-hour opener is a kind of " 'Masterpiece Theatre' meets 'Nova,' " as
    one publicity agent puts it. We are introduced to Darwin, a 19th-century
    gentleman of leisure who loved his wife and children dearly - and was so
    considerate of his wife's religious feeling that he put off publishing "The
    Origin of the Species" for years.

    He also feared the derision that he knew would come with his dangerous ideas
    about a common ancestry, variation, and natural selection. (He didn't know
    about the mechanics of genetic mutation - later discovered by Gregor
    Mendel.)

    Laced throughout the biography are modern illustrations of Darwin's
    discoveries. Because the theory of evolution is the cornerstone of modern
    biology, the series details how it has been applied, particularly to medical
    research.

    Episode 2 takes on the diversity of life on earth, and investigates the
    evolutionary ideas of the journey of sea creatures to land and land mammals
    back to the seas, as well as the emergence of primates and humans.

    Later episodes go on to explore the five mass extinctions that have occurred
    over the life of the planet, new ideas about "survival of the fittest"
    (cooperation is seen to be as important as competition), and symbiosis among
    different species. One whole episode is devoted to sex, asserting that the
    driving force behind culture itself may be sex (certainly a controversial
    hypothesis).

    The emergence of the modern brain is called "The Mind's Big Bang": Some
    50,000 years ago, there was an explosion of social, technological, and
    creative expression - all explained as "adaptive."

    The last hour is devoted to the social and religious rejection of the theory
    of evolution. "What About God?" outlines the struggle in schools waged by
    conservative Christian parents for the right to have "creationism" taught as
    an alternative to evolution.

    Students of science at a conservative Christian college discuss their own
    struggles with their faith and with what they are learning about science.

    In the 1920s, the Scopes "Monkey Trial" put the issue on the map: Should
    evolution be taught in schools?

    "Today, about the same number of states are caught in the same dilemma,"
    Paula Apsell, director of WGBH TV's Boston Science Unit, told the Television
    Critic's Association in July. "Evolution is a subject with ramifications
    that extend into schools, into churches, and into the ballot box. It touches
    people's most deeply held beliefs. The controversy over evolution is one
    that challenges the nature of science itself."

    Eugenie Scott, executive director of the National Center for Science
    Education, adds: "Right now we do have evolution in the curriculum, but we
    cannot count on the textbook publishers and the teachers and the educational
    establishment to be able to continue defending it."

    Part of the problem is poor public relations. Scientists are among the most
    respected citizens of the world. Their intelligence and discipline give them
    authority and stature. While about a third of all scientists report
    believing in some form of higher power, two-thirds do not. Some of the most
    famous of those (Stephen Hawking, Richard Dawkins) have addressed the issues
    of the meaning of life, handing down what amounts to theological
    pronouncements.

    When they presume to chase God out of the heavens, as it were, those who
    have had religious experiences will naturally object.

    "It's an exhilarating tonic to have someone shove a microphone in your face,
    because suddenly you become the authority," says evolutionary biologist Dr.
    Kenneth Miller, author of "Finding Darwin's God."

    "The temptation to expound, not just on the results of your latest
    experiment, but on the ultimate meaning of life, is overwhelming."

    Too few scientists, Dr. Miller says, make very clear when they're speaking
    as scientists exercising scientific judgment and when they're exercising
    philosophical judgment, personal taste, or religious preference.

    A number of scientists in the scientific community have been outspoken in
    their criticism of religion, and it has often lead to a supposition that
    science itself is hostile to religion.

    "But I'd like to say that Western science is born, if you will, out of
    Western religion," Miller says. "The whole scientific impulse comes out of
    Western religion, and it's a very important thing to understand."

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ----
    

    Copyright © 2001 The Christian Science Monitor. All rights reserved.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 21 2001 - 08:32:21 EDT