I had encountered the YEC "explanation" of the canyon that
that the Flood did it. The only supporting evidence was
erroneous claims about present-day erosion.
Dr. David Campbell
"Old Seashells"
46860 Hilton Dr #1113
Lexington Park MD 20653 USA
bivalve@mail.davidson.alumlink.com
"That is Uncle Joe, taken in the masonic regalia of a Grand
Exalted Periwinkle of the Mystic Order of Whelks"-P.G.
Wodehouse, Romance at Droigate Spa
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Allen Roy" <allenroy@peoplepc.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 12:25:07 -0700
>From: bivalve <bivalve@mail.davidson.alumlink.com>
>> One of my Czech relatives claimed that the Grand
Canyon was the result of
>a Czech pioneer seeking to retrieve a nickel he had
dropped down a gopher
>hole. Without any evidence that the processes required
by either model
>could have sufficient effect in the necessary time, I am
sceptical of both.
>The model that you suggest does have the advantage of
not trying to produce
>the canyon during the Flood, in contrast to other YEC
claims that I have
>encountered.
>
>I've heard that it was a Scotsman. :)
>
>I believe that the model I present is the most popular
Flood Catastrophist
>model at this time. (I didn't invent it).
>
>Allen
>
>
______________________________________________
__________________
Sent via the WebMail system at
mail.davidson.alumlink.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 13 2001 - 13:15:09 EDT