Re: The myth of mechanism

From: John W Burgeson (burgytwo@juno.com)
Date: Tue Jun 26 2001 - 11:23:27 EDT

Next message: George Hammond: "Raw physics: How Evolution proves Creationism"

>> But when the phenomenon itself, as well as the mechanism, is what
is proposed and not observed, it's rather a moot point.>>

I had the same thought last year when I read Sheldrak's book. My
impression is that almost all psi research falls into this category.

John Burgeson (Burgy)

www.burgy.50megs.com
(science/theology, quantum mechanics, baseball, ethics,
humor, cars, God's intervention into natural causation, etc.)

Next message: George Hammond: "Raw physics: How Evolution proves Creationism"
Previous message: Steve Krogh: "Re: Ikedaian Cabalism"
Maybe in reply to: John W Burgeson: "The myth of mechanism"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jun 26 2001 - 11:22:08 EDT