Allan Harvey wrote:
<< I make a similar point in an
essay called "What Does 'God of the
Gaps' Mean" which is on the Web at:
http://www.shawangunk.com/scichr/essays/gaps.html
>>
I see,
GG1 == God of the Gaps strategy
GG2 == God of the Gaps theology
and as you say in your post (and URL)....
GG1 -----> GG2 --> embittered atheism
| |
---------<<<<---------
it is a kind of fly in the ointment.
<<
Their total failure to provide such caveats,
whether it is through negligence or because
of their own acceptance of GG theology,
is encouraging large segments of the church
in a march toward a theological cliff.
>>
There seems to be that "need" to have the biggest
the baddest, the roughest, the toughest, etc.
god on the block. The ways of God are so different
from my ways. It seems that God doesn't need to
have "Intel inside" pasted on every unit. Nor
is God inclined to punish the "patient infringer"
(abiogenesis). What matters to God is the heart.
by Grace alone do we proceed,
Wayne
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 05 2000 - 20:49:28 EDT