Bryan wrote:
>If *not*, then at this point, intelligent design by natural causes
(IDNC)
>looks very much like intelligent design by direct action (IDDA).
I didn't thoroughly read all the previous back-posts on these issues
because I'm heavily into some article research, but unless I'm missing
your point (which is possible) this is exactly why I questioned at the
very beginning of the thread does theistic evolution necessarily have
to be opposed to intelligent design. Maybe as defined by some, but not
as defined by others? Sometimes I feel like its the age-old situation
of philosophers arguing about how many angels can dance on the head of
a pin! And it is, truly.
My best,
Wendee
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 05 2000 - 16:11:39 EDT