And I would only add that I have presented a hypothesis and have clearly
stated such. I also didn't claim mine was verified. But I do claim that it
is possible to verify it or refute it. I claimed that it was verifiable
according to the rules of logical postivism (and yes I know that positivism
has now been rejected). The thing that got my goat in all this was that you
seemed to be expecting more of my view than you expected from your own.
I apologize for being blunt and appearing insensitive. To reject a view
that can be verified in favor of views that can't, seems to me to do damage
to lots of things, like consistency, logic and finally the Scripture.
glenn
Foundation, Fall and Flood
Adam, Apes and Anthropology
http://www.flash.net/~mortongr/dmd.htm
Lots of information on creation/evolution