Actual meaning of "design" was: Pennock's...

Tim Ikeda (tikeda@sprintmail.hormel.com)
Tue, 31 Aug 1999 11:19:51 -0400

An unfortunate mistake. Hopefully it was just an unintentional
typo.

Bill:
[...]
> What I in fact wrote is: "Design theorists are no friends of theistic
> evolution." [...]

Why is this? I was not aware that "design" and biological evolution
were necessarily mutually exclusive. While theistic evolution
may be distinct from ID (more often used to describe "Interventionist
Development" than "intelligent design", a mechanistically unspecific
concept), I think that's a separate matter.

Regards,
Tim Ikeda
tikeda@sprintmail.hormel.com