Re: asa-digest V1 #1308

John W. Burgeson (johnburgeson@juno.com)
Tue, 10 Aug 1999 09:50:23 -0600

Friend George Murphy wrote:

"N.B. - I am not saying that one has to _accept_ such approaches in order
to be theologically informed. "

Fair enough. I see your point.

Here is how I see it (part of the issue):

Assume for argument that there are only two positions
available, TE and PC.

What I see is a great lack of data to select from among these positions.

What I also see is a great desire on most people to select one of these
positions and defend it. (I include myself in this).

What I am coming to think is that, on the basis of the lack of data,
that claiming and defending one of these positions, at least
dogmatically,
is both a waste of time and ultimately self-defeating.

But that's just my Tuesday morning musings. Lost a good friend this
morning
to a stroke (she was only in her 40s and had so much to give people). God
moves in mysterious ways and in those ways I haven't a clue sometimes.

Burgy

___________________________________________________________________
Get the Internet just the way you want it.
Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month!
Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.