Yes. Over. Despite the fact that you seem to claim to know my "wordview,"
prefer invective over evidence (I've been called "one of the largest
deceivers" and accused of being not a "credible source"), fail to provide
evidence (also known as credible sources) for your claims, and fail to
explain why being a practicing scientist is irrelevent - would you say that
a practising MD has nothing important to say about disease diagnosis or a
theologian about religion?
Apologies to the other readers of this exchange. I simply noted the lack of
evidence for the claim and asked for some.
-j