(i) reading a popular book is not "doing" science.
(ii) you made the claim that KP is real science. When asked to prove this
with reference to published scientific papers, you refuse to probide any
such evidence. Unless you can show otherwise, I can only assume no such
evidence exists, as references to popular books are not sufficent in the
counrt of scientific appeal.
Both the above strategies are sadly common in YEC (along with the "I'm no
longer going to play the game" stance). You have only managed to prove to
onlookers your unwillingness to back up your claims - you made the claim,
you have to provide evidence.
> > Humor me ... ten peer-reviewed papers _or_ a book published by an
academic
> > press. Perhaps such papers don't exist or else you would have already
told
> > us of them?