Your're wrong again...
Panzious & Wilson --> Microwave background radiation proved the Big Bang.
Before that is was just speculation by Einstein et al...
Repeatability seperates science from philosophy.
Best Wishes,
William - N6RKY
Moorad Alexanian wrote:
>
> Dear William,
>
> Repeatability is an essential ingredient in physics, for instance, but it is
> not in cosmology. The main aspect of cosmology is deductive rather than
> inductive. Accordingly, in cosmology we postulate mathematical models and
> compare its logical implications with the existing cosmological data. Of
> course, the same procedure is used in physics, witness the relativity work
> of Einstein. However, the greatest development in physics is generalizing
> into laws from repeatable, experimental evidence. The latter is lacking in
> any scientific theory relating unique events, e.g., questions of origins.
>
> Take care,
>
> Moorad
> -----Original Message-----
> From: William A. Wetzel <n6rky@pacbell.net>
> To: Keith B Miller <kbmill@ksu.edu>
> Cc: asa@calvin.edu <asa@calvin.edu>
> Date: Wednesday, June 02, 1999 7:17 AM
> Subject: Re: Meta 103: Genes, Genesis, and God: Skyhooks and Cranes
>
> >Keith:
> >
> >Very interesting points here... Question: Repeatability??? Can all of the
> >points be verified in the lab? If not -> it falls well outside the sphere
> >of science.
> >
> >One has to be VERY careful with metaphysics my friend :)
> >
> >Best Wishes,
> >William - N6RKY
-- William A. Wetzel icq-uin# 13983514 http://home.pacbell.net/n6rky http://www.qsl.net/n6rky mailto:n6rky@pacbell.net mailto:n6rky@qsl.net