[Fwd: Re: Dino-Birds]

Massie (mrlab@ix.netcom.com)
Wed, 02 Jun 1999 06:40:59 -0700

Return-Path: <asa-owner-mrlab=ix.netcom.com@udomo3.calvin.edu>
Received: from lists.calvin.edu (udomo3.calvin.edu [153.106.4.240])
by ixmail10.ix.netcom.com (8.8.7-s-4/8.8.7/(NETCOM v1.01)) with SMTP id GAA12966;
for <mrlab@ix.netcom.com>; Wed, 2 Jun 1999 06:45:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 9376 invoked by uid 27); 2 Jun 1999 13:42:18 -0000
Delivered-To: asa@lists.calvin.edu
Received: (qmail 9368 invoked from network); 2 Jun 1999 13:42:17 -0000
Received: from ursa.calvin.edu (153.106.4.1)
by udomo3.calvin.edu with SMTP; 2 Jun 1999 13:42:17 -0000
Received: from dfw-ix15.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix15.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.15])
by ursa.calvin.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA17424
for <asa@calvin.edu>; Wed, 2 Jun 1999 09:40:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from smap@localhost)
by dfw-ix15.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4)
id IAA26853 for <asa@calvin.edu>; Wed, 2 Jun 1999 08:40:16 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from ali-ca13-13.ix.netcom.com(209.110.227.13) by dfw-ix15.ix.netcom.com via smap (V1.3)
id rma026825; Wed Jun 2 08:39:52 1999
Message-ID: <375530BB.360A@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 06:25:15 -0700
From: Massie <mrlab@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: mrlab@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (WinNT; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: asa@calvin.edu
Subject: Re: Dino-Birds
References: <19990602121212.66810.qmail@hotmail.com> <37552CB0.118C@ix.netcom.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: asa-owner@udomo3.calvin.edu
Precedence: bulk

Massie wrote:
>
> Adam Crowl wrote:
> >
> > Hi ASA,
> >
> > Chinese researchers, in the latest issue of "Nature" [27 May 1999], report a
> > new find of a dinosaur with filamentary integument i.e. pre-feathers, just
> > like _Sinosauropteryx_. These filaments are clearly covering the animal
> > rather than deceptively seeming like sub-dermal structures, as in the case
> > of _Sinosauropteryx_, and the individual filaments seem to have hollow cores
> > like true feathers. They're obviously not flight feathers, but they are a
> > possible preadaptation ready for transformation in gliding arboreal dinos or
> > leaping cursorial dinos.
> >
> > The question for YECs and other sceptics of evolution is "why did God bother
> > making all these curious creatures that cross the boundaries of supposed
> > 'kinds'?" It all so naturally lends itself to an evolutionary interpretation
> > so I wonder why God didn't contrive the world to be less confusing - "he is
> > not a God of confusion" - and less misleading, since his nature and power
> > are supposed to be clearly seen in Nature. None of it makes sense unless
> > evolution is true. Else God is a bigger liar than Satan, or this world has
> > evolved.
> >
> > Adam
> >
> > Or so it seems to me
> >
> > ______________________________________________________
> > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
> ****************
> Adam
>
> You are not alone in thinking that you know the mind of God. What basis
> do you have for saying that God made the wrong numbers of what you
> define as "kinds." JS Gould of course made a big case of his proported
> understanding of the wisdom of God in The Panda's Thumb. Who knows why
> he made the diversity of kinds (a human definition) and what gives you
> the insight into the workings of his mind. Further, what limites the
> Creator from making whatever it pleases him regardless of you dismay
> what how it fits into the current human model of biodiverstiy. I will
> follow the postings very carefully and I await your explanation. I
> would want at least to hear that you:
>
> Give us a listing of all the "kinds" of creatures on the planet.
>
> Tell us how they interact to form the integrated biological system.
>
> Explain to us your criteria for selecting the mistakes and give us some
> integrated explanation.
>
> Bert Massie