RE: Science you'd be proud of; or the results of theistic evoluti
Rasmussen, Ryan J. (rasmussen@mcnamee.com)
Tue, 1 Jun 1999 13:23:49 -0400
You wrote:
[snip]
> We Christians, do not walk by the sight of our eyes for our
>understanding and guidance in this world of flesh. Rather we
>Christians, as we've been instructed by our apostles and prophets,
>Romans 8:14, for example (For as many as are led by the Spirit of God,
>they are the sons of God), follow the spirit of our Lord. We know that
>to follow the sight of our own eyes is to, by definition, follow
>corruption. And we just don't do that. No, you see, we don't follow
>heretical, that is, divisive, doctrines of devils, for example, the
>abominal doctrine of theistic evolution. We obediently follow the
>language of our Lord Jesus (JEHOVAH IS SALVATION) for guidance.
[snip]
>If you just let the truth speak for itself, you'd see that evolution is
utter
> abomination. A priori reasoning is only appropriate when you know the
> absolute truth. And if evolution is true, how come there's no proof?
You make it sound as if absolute truth is so easy to obtain if we focus
only on God's word. If you are so certain of this please answer this
one question I have. Which denomination of Christianity properly holds
to the absolute Truth of God's word? Catholics? Protestants?
Baptists? Lutherans? Fundamentalists? Even when we as humans go to
the source of Truth we end up with differing interpretations with
everyone procaiming their "truth".
Where is the Christianity I should be proud of?
Ryan