Moorad
-----Original Message-----
From: Pim van Meurs <entheta@eskimo.com>
To: 'Moorad Alexanian' <alexanian@uncwil.edu>; asa@calvin.edu
<asa@calvin.edu>; Biochmborg@aol.com <Biochmborg@aol.com>; Pim van Meurs
<entheta@eskimo.com>; evolution@calvin.edu <evolution@calvin.edu>
Date: Wednesday, May 05, 1999 11:11 PM
Subject: RE: Life in the Lab -- Fox and the Nobel Prize
>Moorad:
>Death is an essential feature of something that is alive. If it does not
>die, then it was not a material entity that was previously alive. Moorad
>
>But what is death ? You are merely side-stepping the issue here.
>
>
>>Perhaps it would be helpful if one could define "alive" ?
>>
>>----------
>>From: Biochmborg@aol.com[SMTP:Biochmborg@aol.com]
>>Sent: Monday, May 03, 1999 8:33 PM
>>To: alexanian@uncwil.edu; evolution@calvin.edu; asa@calvin.edu
>>Subject: Re: Life in the Lab -- Fox and the Nobel Prize
>>
>>In a message dated 5/3/99 7:08:01 AM Mountain Daylight Time,
>>alexanian@uncwil.edu writes:
>>
>>> My point is that it hasn't been accomplished. The transition from dead
>>> matter to living matter is a tough one.
>>
>>In what way are Fox's protocells not alive?
>>
>>Kevin L. O'Brien
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>