-----Original Message-----
From: Pim van Meurs <entheta@eskimo.com>
To: alexanian@uncwil.edu <alexanian@uncwil.edu>; asa@calvin.edu
<asa@calvin.edu>; 'Biochmborg@aol.com' <Biochmborg@aol.com>;
evolution@calvin.edu <evolution@calvin.edu>
Date: Wednesday, May 05, 1999 11:36 AM
Subject: RE: Life in the Lab -- Fox and the Nobel Prize
>Perhaps it would be helpful if one could define "alive" ?
>
>----------
>From: Biochmborg@aol.com[SMTP:Biochmborg@aol.com]
>Sent: Monday, May 03, 1999 8:33 PM
>To: alexanian@uncwil.edu; evolution@calvin.edu; asa@calvin.edu
>Subject: Re: Life in the Lab -- Fox and the Nobel Prize
>
>In a message dated 5/3/99 7:08:01 AM Mountain Daylight Time,
>alexanian@uncwil.edu writes:
>
>> My point is that it hasn't been accomplished. The transition from dead
>> matter to living matter is a tough one.
>
>In what way are Fox's protocells not alive?
>
>Kevin L. O'Brien
>
>
>