Sorry to "butt in" but isn't it the onus on you to show that these analyses
support your theory? I thought that it was the task of a challenger to
argue his (or her) case using published information or information obtained
by the challenger.
Chuck Vandergraaf
Pinawa, MB
> ----------
> From: Allen Roy[SMTP:allen@infomagic.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 1999 12:11 AM
> To: asa@calvin.edu; Steven H. Schimmrich
> Subject: Re: Four Rivers Revisited
>
> > From: Steven H. Schimmrich <sschimmr@calvin.edu>
> > Perhaps you'd like to discuss the extensive literature on sedimentary
> > diagenesis. I would particularly like to know, for example, how trace
> > element analysis, cathodoluminescense examination, fluid inclusion
> > analysis, and oxygen and strontium isotopic values (among other things)
> > support your hypothesis.
>
> Sure, why not. Show how these analyses of the rocks disprove a
> catastrophe setting.
>
> Allen
>
>