One of the predictions of the global flood is that the preflood animals
which got on the ark got off the ark and repopulated the earth. This means
that we should find all animals throughout the geologic column. The finding
of all living animals (or a big percentage) would verify the global flood
view at the expense of evolution, because no morphological change would
have occurred. I fail to see how this can't be the case.
>What it would do is move the debate as to where it happened to some
>place other than our earth.
No, it would move the debate to how rapidly it occured if one still wanted
to believe in evolution. If kitty cats were found in the Cambrian
throughout the world, one would need to explain their stasis for such a
long time as well as the fact that they suddenly appeared.
glenn
Adam, Apes and Anthropology
Foundation, Fall and Flood
& lots of creation/evolution information
http://www.isource.net/~grmorton/dmd.htm