Re: Re: Re: Evolution is alive and well

Moorad Alexanian (alexanian@UNCWIL.EDU)
Mon, 19 Oct 1998 12:45:22 -0500 (EST)

At 03:50 PM 10/18/98 -0500, Glenn R. Morton wrote:
>Hi Bob,
>
>At 07:08 AM 10/14/98 EDT, RDehaan237@aol.com wrote:
>
>>To compare Darwin's "theory" with Newton's laws of gravity or laws of motion
>>is a bit of a stretch, IMHO. Where is the mathematics underlying Darwinian
>>theory? Where are the precise predictions that are at all comparable to what
>>can be made from Newton's laws?
>
>In complex systems, prediction is impossible. It is impossible to
>accurately predict where the sun will be on its next orbit around the
>galaxy because of the vast number (billions) of stellar gravitational
>fields that the sun will encounter on the next orbit. Thus, Newtonian
>gravitation (and indeed General Relativity) is unable to make predictions
>about complex systems. So are we to conclude from this that gravity
>doesn't exist?

Dear Gregg,

Newton's theory of gravitation is a deterministic theory and as such can
make short term predictions with the aid of computers. The men we sent to
the moon did land on the moon, didn't they?

>>Darwin had an important concept, but hardly a theory. There is enough wiggle
>>room and stretch in it, that no matter what observations one brings to it, an
>>evolutionist can assert, 'It's consistent with the Darwin's theory.'"
>
>I think one could say that Newton had an important concept, but hardly a
>theory. There is enough wiggle room and stretch in it, that no matter what
>observations one brings to it, a committed gravitationalist can assert
>"It's consistent with the Newtonian (or Einsteinian) theory."
>
>glenn

There is no wiggle room in Newtonian theory. In fact, it was shown to make
wrong predication for the perihelion precession of Mercury. Einstein's
theory gave the correct value for the motions of the perihelia.

Moorad