I thought about the Sun's creation on the fourth
>"day." Hence, the first three days, I reasoned, surly were not solar. Only
>then did I became open to non literal interpretations
>of Genesis.
Literal is not the problem. Bad interpretation is.
>In other words, biblical exegeses is what enlightened me to
>the need for another view than YEC, not science which I viewed with suspicion.
>Perhaps we should start there; a simple questioning of just what is a "day."
To anyone who is interested I will be happy to send my chapter: "Days of
Creation: Hours or Eons." It was also an article in "Perspectives" a
few years ago.
Dick Fischer
THE ORIGINS SOLUTION
http://www.orisol.com