>That figure you use of 10^94. We don't know that these will function just
>fine (to say nothing of dandy) at all. We only know of a few thousand that
>will function just fine in specific organisms and one or a handful that
>will function just fine in man. The others are just hypothetically
>conceivable, but untested. Probably most would not work in man, So your
>point is weak.
What Yockey did was substitute hydrophobics for hydrophobics, hydrophyllics
for hydrophyllics. These are unlikely to alter function. Then he calculated
the useful ones.
glenn
Foundation, Fall and Flood
http://www.isource.net/~grmorton/dmd.htm