Re: gaps?

Paul Arveson (arveson@oasys.dt.navy.mil)
Wed, 6 Mar 96 17:29:02 EST

In message <v01540b00ad63a008df3e@[204.157.128.56]> Bill Dozier writes:
> >> Far too many people seem to believe that there *must*, at the end of the
> >> game, remain *some* part of the Creation process that we will *never* be
> >> able to explain. At its basis, this is "God of the gaps" thinking.
> >
> >Isn't it true that far too many people seem to believe that eventually
> >*all* phenomena are suseptible to naturalistic explanation? At its basis,
> >this is "Science of the gaps" thinking.
> >
>
> True enough. However, it is not necessary to choose between only these
> positions.
>
>
Bill: This is an interesting thread. I think I know what you are suggesting,
but please elaborate for everyone's sake.

Paul Arveson, Research Physicist
73367.1236@compuserve.com arveson@oasys.dt.navy.mil
(301) 227-3831 (W) (301) 227-1914 (FAX) (301) 816-9459 (H)
Code 724, NSWC, Bethesda, MD 20084